Policy of Appeasement: Good or Bad? Essay

aft(prenominal) the abundant War, Germany and a couple other countries were greatly penalize, having to pay reparations and territorial losses. Hitler, soon to be a dictator, essendialed to change that. He believed that Germany had been punished too severely and wanted revenge because he had such a strong disposal and military, there were many ways of going close check-out procedureping him. During the 1930s, the insurance policy of appeasement was the most effective receipt to Hitlers aggression because of many reason but mainly that it book wild pansy and didnt start war, the people did non support the war, and because the British necessitate more clipping to prepare for war.First of all, one reason why appeasement was the most effective response because for the time being, it kept wild pansy passim Europe, and after only 20 years of peace from the Great War, people didnt want another. While Chamberlain was secretly trying to realise more time he claims that he is tho trying to keep peace but if requirement, he will take action, I shall not give up the hope of a peaceful solution til now if it were sure that any nation had made up its mind to tower the world by its fear of force, I should feel that it must be resistedbut war is a fearful thing (Document 7).This quote signifies that although Chamberlain verbalise he was a man of peace that if he thought it was necessary he would start a war. One problem with appeasement is that some(a) people think that war could grow been totally avoided if Hitler had been stood up, because the Czech defenses were genuinely strong and because the German generals, conscious of Germanys relative weakness at that moment, were actually prepared to attempt to remove Hitler (Document 9). So if the British had stood up to Hitler and beat him, the war would have been over and Hitler subdued.Furthermore, appeasement was a best policy because even if Chamberlain had wanted war, the Congress didnt and after just coming out of a pointless war that killed many lives, zilch was willing to do another. British historian Keith Eubank states Neither the people nor the government of (Britain and France) were conditioned to idea of warHitler had done nothing that any major power considered dangerous enough to warrant a major European war (Document 10). Another problem with appeasement is that if you are going to have a trust between people over a moot discipline, you cant do it with a man like Hitler who is know for backstabbing and disloyalty. Trusting Hitler was a risky thing for Chamberlain because while they are resting in peace, Hitler could sneak attack and take an advantage on a precise important war.Lastly and most importantly, Chamberlain made the most effective response of Hitlers aggression because at that time, the British needed more time to update their weapons and prepare for war. They were not at all ready and Germany was playacting very aggressive lately so Chamberlain made t he right prime(a) of buying the British time so they could win the war. A British foreign secretary describes his meeting with other governments, public opinion was potently opposed to any action against the Germansmost people were saying openly that they did not see why the Germans should not occupy the Rhinelandtaking or so any risk in order to avoid the situation (Document 12). It was to a fault believed that if Britain had more time, they would win the war, time is in our favorit would be erupt to fight her in say 6 12 months time, than to accept the enter challenge (Document 13).The most important reason as to why appeasement was a bad thing is because it gave Hitler more land and freedom. When Hitler received Sudeten grime without having to lift a finger causes him to believe Britain and France dont want to fight a war (which they didnt) and makes him think he can perk up away with more things. Hitler sees their peacefulness and takes his aggression into action, German y toady cast mop up the last shackles fastened upon her by the Treaty of Versailles when Adolf Hitler, as commander-in-chief of the Reich defense forces, sent his new battalions into the Rhinelands demilitarized zone (Document 4). Britain used appeasement to buy cunning time to prepare and Hitler thought of this as them backing down and took force, which more or less won him the war.The whole idea of appeasement was a controversial topic between politicians. It was a good idea because it kept peace throughout Europe, people wouldnt have agreed to the war aspect anyways, and that it bought British the time they needed to recover for another war. It was a bad policy because it gave Hitler confidence, Hitler may have been overthrown if a little opposition was expressed, and that Hitler couldnt be trusted. In conclusion, the policy of appeasement was the most effective way to stop Hitlers aggression.