Consumer Behaviour of Brazilians to detergents

Consumer Behaviour of Brazilians to detersivesConsumer demeanor is a process where individuals or groups go finished to select, purchase, use and dispose of goods, services, ideas or experiences to satisfy their consumes and desires (Solomon, Marsh all, Stuart, Barnes and Mitchell, 2009). The major question for every comp either How do consumers respond to various foodstuffing efforts the company magnate use? The take oning diagram shows that the grocery stocking and stimuli bow the consumers Black Box (consumers mind) and produce certain responses.Fig 1 input signal response model of vendee behaviourConsumer behaviours atomic number 18 influenced strongly by cultural, social, personal and psychological characteristics as sh witness be offsetFig 2 Factors influencing consumer behaviour(Source Philip Kotler, Gary Armstrong, Veronica Wong John Saunders, Principles of securities industrying, 1999)CultureCulture is the close to basic cling to of a persons wants and be haviour. In Unilever illustration at Brazil, the clothes be wash more(prenominal) frequently in NE than SE approx. 5 clock a week against 3.9 periods. Most of the women at NE atomic number 18 housewives and they took this action at law of process clothes as pleasurable activities. There is nonpareil more reason that the women at NE by and broad do their dry wash in a public laundry, river or pond because it parts them an opportunity to become social, date their friends where at SE mostly women do their wash at home plate alone. The people at NE similarly attach the cleanliness as a symbolic value to their status.Due to the cultural differences and washing methods, the laundry slash usage at NE per demoralizeer is 20.4 kg against whole 6.8 kg of SE. On the contrast, at that place was in truth less difference between the consumption of detersive pulverizations between NE and SE, provided 1.5 kg per misdirecter. (refer to exhibit 3) well-disposed ClassSocial d ivisiones ar societys relatively permanent and ordered divisions whose phallus partake similar values, interests and behaviours. In Brazil there ar 5 social classes establish on the income as A, B, C, D and E (E+ E-). As per exhibit 2, only 21% population of SE is E class compared to 53% of NE. So the most of the population at NE are wiped out(p) income consumers.Generally the spurn social class people are more culture-bound which shows their behaviour of purchasing purifyings.FamilyFamily members can strongly influence buyer behaviour. The buyers spouse and children has a direct influence on everyday buying behaviour.In berth of Brazil, majority of NE women see the cleanliness of clothes as an indication of the dedication of the mformer(a) to her family in spite of washing finished laundry gunk requires an intensive labour. This fact influences the consumer to buy the different purifyings mostly laundry lashs at Brazil. Most of the families with washing work like to buy purifying pulverisation (there only 28% household own the washing machine at NE) instead of laundry clean.Economic SituationA persons economic situation exit affect proceeds choice which is intelligibly visible at Brazil. The low income consumers of NE would give care to buy Omo, the topper crack of the market but their tight bud throw leads them to buy cheaper topical anaesthetic anaesthetic anesthetic marks from the nearby polished shops.Perception and BeliefsIn Brazil, the consumers (primarily low income) evaluate the detersive against the six key attributes as shown in exhibit 6 along with determine. Since Campeiro scored very low on all the attributes and resulted with only 6% of market package. The consumers of NE are very particular about the various attributes of purifyings like power of the detergent (its susceptibility to clean and whiten clothes with a subtle quantity of production) judged by the quantity of foam it produced. The low income consum ers are also very much attached with boxes and regarded anything else as good for only second-rate products.The major factors which influence the consumer behaviour are discussed above. Most large companies also research consumer buying decisions which are closely related with the factors of consumer behaviour. A typical buyer decision process can be shown as belowFig3 Buyer Decision Process mold(Source Philip Kotler, Gary Armstrong, Veronica Wong John Saunders, Principles of Marketing, 1999)In the minded(p) incident, the purchase of detergent is a regular purchase for any family. Since the most of the families owned a washing machine at SE, so they are much reducesed to buy the detergent powder. At NE only 28% households own the washing machine. The important fact here is that both the consumers of NE and SE are well aware about the brand and recognises Omo as the exceed detergent powder in the market. hardly at NE, approx 53% consumers cant spend to buy the Omo due to thei r low-income. The northeasterns are also non fond of obtain at big retails like Wal-Mart, instead of they prefer to buy the detergent from the near buy shops. As per the details provided in the case, it seems that the Unilever brand is not for sale in 75000 modest store of NE where the products of their competitors are available. In this situation, the consumers confound limited option to buy.Answer 1 (ii)The market in terms of the main brands/players and their strategiesAt present in the NE detergent market, there are only twain major players- Unilever and Procter Gamble. There are a few local players are also available in the market but mostly they are in the laundry soap market.Unilever is a US$56 billion company, headquartered in London (UK) with 300,000 employees in more than 150 countries. Unilever started its operation in 1929 and now become a pioneer of the consumer goods industry in Brazil. Unilever launched the first detergent powder as Omo in the Brazilian market. As mentioned in the case, Unilever is a market draw in the detergent powder category, having 81% of market administer with leash brandsOmo (one of the Brazils favourite brand)Minerva (Only brand sold as both detergent powder and laundry soap)Campeiro (Unilevers cheapest brand)Omo is a premium product with 52% of market treat at a woo of $3/kg. The main USP of Omo is the risque ability to remove stains. Minerva is relatively cheaper brand as compare to Omo with 17% share in the detergent powder at a terms of $2.4/kg. Minerva is the only Unilever brand which is competing with local brands in laundry soap market and is the market leader. In the laundry soap market Minerva fork out 19% share at a price of $1.7/kg.On the other hand, Procter Gamble is a US$40 billion company, headquartered in Cincinnati (US) with 98,000 employees in 80 countries. PG entered in the Brazilian market in 1988 and acquired the detergent business of a Brazilian company named as Bombril and its three brandsQuonto (migrated as nab)Odd Fases (migrated as Bold) bag (low-price brand)PG is the second player with 15% share of the Brazilian detergent market.Ace is the main brand of PG and competitor to Unilever products (Omo and Minerva) with 11% share in the detergent powder market at a price of $2.4/kg. The other products of PG have only 6% share of the market at a price of $2.3/kg. PG did not manufacture laundry soap.At present the NE detergent powder market worth of US$106 million is growing with a remarkable annual rate of 17%. Since the manufacturing process is very superior intensive, so the entry barrier is very high in this market. On the contrary, the laundry soap market worth of US$102 millions is growing at a slower annual rate of 6%. Since the production of soap is very cheap, thus there are low barriers to entry. before long PG are intentioning towards the low-income consumers of the NE market. PG drawing on worldwide RD and marketing expertise is resolution up and g o forth attack to this part. There were also threats of small local brands targeted at low-income consumers. Unilever is also looking to explore the growth opportunities in the detergent market to low-income consumers of NE. But Unilever is facing some internal resistance from Mr. Fernanda Machado (Category passenger car for detergents).Answer 1(iii)Present situation of Unilever and its Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threatsWith the data available in the case study, the Unilever fig up analysis is as belowTable 1 SWOT AnalysisAnswer 2Strategy for Unilever in BrazilUnilever would follow the Target Marketing Strategy (Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning) dodging for the low-income consumers in Brazil. The succeeding(a) diagram explains the various steps involved Target- marketing processSource Solomon, Marshall, Stuart, Barnes and Mitchell Marketing Real People, Real Decisions 1st European EditionsFig 4 locomote in the Targeting Marketing StrategySegmentationThe de tergent market at Brazil is already segmented into two partsHigh Income consumers financial support at SoutheastLow income consumers living at atomic number 10The Northeast market could be classified under Geodemography segment due to most of the consumers have low income and share similar characteristics.TargetingDetergent Market segment is registering a 17% annual growth in Brazil and there is a big potential market in NE with 48 M of Low Income consumers. The Purchasing power of the low income consumers has increased by 27%.PositioningHere Unilever had to evolve a strategy for the target segment with a product that meets the consumers requirement and expectations.Based on the contemporary situation as mentioned in the case, I feel that the Unilever has the following options to pass finished the low income consumers at BrazilOption 1- Unilever could reposition the Minerva further quite a little market in relation to Omo BrandOption 2- Unilever could re-launch of the Campeir o as a low-cost brandOption 3- Unilever could develop a cheaper variance of the Omo brandOption 4- Unilever can create a new Brand or launch a new brand from its portfolio in Brazil.Option 1 forget be less costly option to implement by Unilever since Minerva brand is already present in the mind of Brazilian consumers. But I feel that it was not well positioned in the market. Minerva is a product target to the middle income consumers and there was no details mentioned in the case about them. Thus repositioning Minerva to further down for low income consumers will reduce its market share from 17% (refer Exhibit 7) to even lower therefore it will create a new opportunity for other competitors in the market.Option 2 will become costly and inefficacious for Unilever because already Campeiro is recognized as a low cost and low shade product (with ref. to exhibit 8). Hence changing the image of Campeiro in consumers (low income) mind will take a very long time to achieve.Option 3 could not be implemented by Unilever because Omo is a high quality and high price product (ref. to exhibit 5, 7, 8 9). It would also create confusion between the two version of Omo (High quality and the cheaper version) in the detergent powder market. There is also a orifice that the consumers of Southeast also start consuming the cheaper version on Omo and it will lead towards the reduced sale of High quality Omo. So Unilever should not attempt to develop a cheaper version of Omo.Option 4 based on the SWOT analysis (refer table 1, Page no. 7) Unilever could figure to develop a new product for the low income consumers. Since Unilever is having a very vast range of detergent brands. So instead of investing to develop a new product, Unilever might also choose a product from its Latin America portfolio, a brand which satisfies the needs of low income consumers with in Brazil.Unilever can use either of go out or turn on strategy in order to penetrate the Low income consumer market of No rtheast Brazil.The encourage strategyThere was no doubt that the best detergent available on the Brazilian market is Omo. With ref to the exhibit 7, Unilever dont have any competitor for their Omo brand being the costliest product in the detergent powder market.As per option4, Unilever should introduce the extension of Minerva Brand instead of developing a new brand. The extension of Minerva brand as Minerva ghastly 10/10 with more cleaning power while retaining the fragrance and less focus on softness packaged in the cardboard boxes.Now the following Marketing Mix should be implemented to penetrate the Northeast marketMinerva Blues target groups are the low income consumers who buy local brands and detergents from the small stores located in Northeast.The Marketing Mix for struggle strategy is as belowProductThe Minerva Blue would be packaged in two sizes 1 Kg and 500 g. The Minerva Blue would be designed beautifully so that the even illiterate consumers can recognize it very e asily. The encase should be designed in much(prenominal) a way that it would be easy to open and also protect the powder from humidity.PriceThe price of Minerva Blue should be cheaper than Campeiro. Unilever have to identify a cheaper packaging convention so that it can reduce the whole sale price of Minerva Blue below than Campeiro. Unilever could use the following approach to price the Minerva Blue face cost $ 1.00Packaging cost $ 0.30 promotional cost $ 0.30Distribution cost $ 0.05Total cost $ 1.65 shoesAs per the details mentioned in the addicted case, Northeasterns are not in favor to shop from big outlets, they prefer to shop from small stores. The big issue is that Unilever detergents are absent from 75,000 stores in Northeast where the products of other competitors like PG and as well as local brands are available. Distribution of the products in Northeast is the major weakness of Unilever.In order to cover all the 75,000 small stores of Northeast, Unilever should have t o introduce its own units of vans, visiting every single store trying to list all Unilever detergent brands.Unilever could also distribute its Minerva Blue brand in SE, as per exhibit 2, approx 21% of the population of Southeast is in class E.PromotionSince the consumers of Northeast are buying from the nearby small stores. Thus Unilever should focus to have promotions and visibility of their products in those stores. The promotion should be in much(prenominal) a way that when a consumer entered into a small store must(prenominal) realize that the Unilever had created a brand Minerva Blue only for him, his own version of Omo. Unilever could follow the conventional methods of advertising ATL (Above the Line) campaign to deliver the right pass to the low income consumers through media such as television, radio, print and banners to set up its brand. As per the given details, the Brazilians are avid television watchers irrespective of their income. Unilever could also promote their product in popular parties of Northeast like Carnival, Forro Festivals and Maracatu.The low income consumers might be reluctant to buy a product advertised as FOR LOW INCOME PEOPLE, because it gives a message of inferior quality product. So Unilever should never use in an ATL communication the term of FOR LOW INCOME PEOPLE . delineate strategyWith ref. to the case, there are total 7 products in the detergent powder market where 75% of market share captured by Unilever through its 3 products all combined Omo, Minerva and Campeiro (ref. to exhibit 7). Thus introduction of a new product from its portfolio will create cannibalization for Unilever. The same concern is also raised by Mr. Fernanda.So instead of introducing a new brand in the market, Unilever should focus to expand its detergent powder market share by adding new consumers. This can be achieved only by push button the low income consumers to buy Unilever products. In other words, upgrade the laundry soap consumers to deter gent powder consumers.The marketing MIX for PULL strategy is as belowProductUnilever had to promote their all 3 brands Omo, Minerva and Campeiro in the small stores of Northeast.PromotionThe promotion strategy would remain same as wedge strategy. On top of that in store promotions are very important. Unilever could flip a very deplumateive offer to the low income consumer which insist the NE population to buy the Unilever products like Buy 1 Campeiro and get one free or can earn some points which could lead them to get a free Omo etc.The above strategy will attract new consumers for detergent powders. Simultaneously Unilever could also signup business contracts to promote the Unilever products with the lavation machine dealers. So whenever any consumer buys a new washing machine the dealer would suggest them to use only the Unilever Brand detergent powders.PlaceThe distribution strategy could be the same as mentioned in the PULL Strategy.In addition to that, Unilever should ens ure that in any small store their all 3 brands must be available at any moment with different SKU which gives an opportunity to the capable consumers to upgrade themselves for high price detergents. Unilever should also ensure that if the small store owners/managers can offer an pocket section of Unilever products where only Unilever products are available. So in such case consumer dont have any options to buy any other detergent.PriceCurrently Campeiro is the only brand focused to low income consumers which is available for $ 1.70 to retailers compare to its positive cost $ 1.45. Thus at wholesale price Unilever is able to have the margin of approximately 17%. Hence Unilever could reduce its margin by redefining the formula of Campeiro which could add some more attribute as per the need of NE consumers like clean and whiten clothes with a small quantity with good quantity of foam, add some perfume etc.ConclusionBeing the low income consumers doesnt affect their brand conscious. T hese consumers are constantly looking for good and reliable quality product at a fair price. These consumers might not be able to afford the best brand of the market, but they do see the high price of such products as an indication of value. More than three-quarters of the global population is low income, and more of them have been historically beyond the reach of organized retailers.In the given case study of Brazilian Fabric Wash Market, the population of Northeast is well aware about the Unilever Brand Omo but due to high price they cant afford it.To serve low-income consumers successfully, Unilever must first grudge for their lower purchasing power. To penetrate the Low income market, Unilever might use the belief of 4 As as belowPromote offering through mix of outletsReduce Cost to serveShorten Supply kitchen stoveSelect and support retailersLocalize sourcingReduce packaging size for low price per unitFocus development on customersEmploy progressive thinking to meetFig 4A s Diagram Sources Jame Andereson, Net Blog service the worlds Poor, Innovation at the base of Economic PyramidBased on the above discussion of PUSH and PULL strategies, PULL strategy would give the result in a longer term but the PUSH strategy would give the result immediately. So I would recommend PUSH strategy as the Best Strategy for Unilever in Brazil.In the piddling term, Money need to be invested and therefore diverted from premium brands to low price brand. It gives Unilever a momentum and advantage in a spendthrift growing market. With the right strategy, low income consumers will be ready to gift for a new brand and Omo buyers will not move which will make Unilever a leader in low-income consumer marketing.