Criminal Justice Organizational Trends Paper Essay

The advancement of technology is affecting everyone in their everyday lives whether we want to accept it or not. The lamentable justice system is no stranger to this it has created more work for them and in order for them to keep pace with deplorables they abide to continue to evolve and bewilder underway with the progress of technology. Technology changes from one day to the next and in order to fight and prevent crime the out virtue justice system must stay current with the many changes of technology. Their victory in the fight against crime depends on how well they argon able to adapt to the changes. The writer will talk round the use of privatization and militarization of the criminal justice organizations as well as different behavior theories and the effect of societal and organizational diversity and the use of the criminal justice motivational theories matrix in this paper.Privatization can be accomplished in a host of ways in its most basic form, it is the betrothal of public functions by private entities orindividuals (Finegan). Privatization has had a heavy effect on the criminal justice system and punishment systems. This is definitely not a new idea it is in some ways a return to what was done years ago. Before the nineteenth century private groups and individuals handled the majority of criminal justice functions. The privatization of law enforcement services are on the rise, and as a result law enforcement agencies will be in competition with private organizations for law enforcement services (Harvey).Its time for American police to remember that they are supposed to protect and allot our communities, not wage war on the battalion who live in them (n.d.). Law enforcement agencies everywhere are spending billions of dollars on military type equipment to use in their everyday policing, acting as if the neighborhoods they serve are warzones. As Ryan Grim said in the Huffington Post in reference to the situation in Ferguson, Missouri, Poli ce militarization has been among the most consequential and an unmarked development of our time and it is now beginning to affect press freedom (Timm).Radly Balko of the libertarian Cato Institute is highly critical of the way police tactics and swat teams turn in grown in this country. He believes that swat teams have a place in larger jurisdictions but not so sure about the smaller jurisdictions. Balko is especially critical of the way swat teams are used in an unsuitable fashion when conducting routine police work and where an individuals well-mannered liberties are often violated and where the swat team mistakenly uses force against innocent mass.Diversity within the criminal justice system has both unequivocal and negative effects throughout our communities. There have instances where unethical practices of discrimination, bias, and prejudice have been committed against minorities in our communities. These practices have been performed by prosecutors, law enforcement offi cers and judges who have been designated with the power by our state and federal governments.United States in the twenty first century is facing multi heathenish societies individuals working in the system are characterized with defendants,society, inmates, victims, political leaders and professionals all originating from diverse cultural orientations (Barlow, 2000). The government believes that cultural diversity in the United States makes to creative thinking, policy changes, new ideas and looks at laws, procedures, and policies that contribute to inequality and equality. There are some people that support the notion that laws protecting minority group are a direct result of cultural diversity, and these people are inclined to be against such laws.While the advancement in technology might decrease the need for additional police officers, in that location are other factors that just might cause a different effect. The first change is our overall demographic change, a rise in peop le of color. This increase unfortunately has also caused the crime rate to increase. Therefore the changes may just cancel one another out and in order to bid adequate service and protection to our communities, the law enforcement agencies will probably need to maintain their current staff levels moving forward. While law enforcement agencies will be held accountable like never before, both for their actions and what happens in their jurisdictions, they need to do more in preparation for the future. They can select, place and train their employees to assure their success through the appropriate jobs, good organizational structure, and an emphasis on strong ethical values.ReferencesBarlow, H. D. (2000). Criminal Justice in America. Upper Saddle River, N.J. Prentice-Hall.Finegan, S. (2012, August). Watching the Watchers The festering Privatization of Criminal Law Enforcement and the Need for Limits on Neighborhood Watch Associations. ORLANDO SENTINEL.Harvey, A. J. (1994). Building a n Organizational Foundation for the Future. Retrieved from http//www.hitechcj.com/organizational_foundation.htmlTimm, T. (2014, August 14). Lessons from Ferguson Police Militarization is Now a jamming Freedom Issue. Huffington Post.War Comes Home The Excessive Militarization of American Policing. (n.d.). Retrieved from https//www.aclu.org/war-comes-home-excessive-militarization-american-policing