Poverty and Lifeboat Ethics Essay

A renowned Chinese proverb goes Give a man a look for and he result eat for a day teach him how to angle and he will eat for the rest of his days. Although this wise advice was given thousands of historic period ago, nowadays looks like no powerful or well-heeled authorities on Earth understands that sentence.Garrent Hardin, author of Lifeboat Ethics The Case Against Helping the piteous show us an honest perspective on how the rich countries in the world, by donating food and money, instead of helping poor countries get forbidden of their misery, cause more hunger and strife. In addition, he tells us that overpopulation in poor countries should be controlled soon, or the current situation will delve ugly very fast.Although Hardins evidence is almost indisputable, his position is not. I understand why the author believes that helping poor people is a bad idea but he isnt looking at many others sides of the situation. At the beginning, my reaction was the opposite. I was tota lly convinced by Hardins theory. I desperately sought a place deep down a lifeboat But after discussing the essay in class, and hearing myself recapitulate Hardins words that express his indifference about poor people, and overly rethinking his thesis in which poor people dont rush a chance for a better life, I switch overd my position. I plentyt support those ideas because in my own point of view, they are false. It is just now not authoritative. slightly countries and some societies already made a change. Some countries like South Korea, Singapore and China have broken the pauperism cycle. We shouldnt be so negative and we must remember that blushing the poorest people on the planet have imagination, ideas, beliefs and an imperative necessity to change their own universe.However, I think that the answer is within Hardins thesis too. Poor people dont need food and garment only in cases of emergency. Instead, they need a few rich governments elicit in giving them tool s and ways to improve their economies, to develop their ideas and to use their yeasty minds. Without that little help all life in this planet will disappear. So, helping the poor is also a way of helping everyone else, even rich people. And here Hardins thoughts are necessary Without a true world government, controlled reproduction and the use of available resources, the sharing ethic of the spaceship is impossible. (Lifeboat Ethics The Case Against Helping the Poor. Pg. 310.) If the poorest destroy their natural resources, the consequences will be for everyone, regardless of how much each possesses.In conclusion, I think Hardin is place when he asks about the future on Earth, if we take statistics and analyze their results for the course of study 2050. However, his position against helping poor people and trying to eliminate them from the brass instrument of the Earth is wrong. I believe in a true world, where rich countries use their development technology and their healthy, w ell-nourished minds to decrease the percentage of pauperism in the world, and where everyone wins the right to live in this, our planet Earth.